Volume 31, Issue 1 (2024)                   AIJH 2024, 31(1): 123-144 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

arjmand R, Najafizadeh A, Sarlak A. risk classification model. AIJH 2024; 31 (1) :123-144
URL: http://aijh.modares.ac.ir/article-31-57493-en.html
1- PhD student in Economics, Arak Branch, Islamic Azad University of Arak, Arak, Iran
2- PHD Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch , Abbnaj@yahoo.com
3- phd Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Arak Branch, Arak, Iran
Abstract:   (642 Views)
Changes in banking business model, entering new markets, switching traditional and classical systems' nature to electronic banking and entering digital banking, as well as the emergence of FinTechs and startups in the banking industry on the one hand and the lack of a comprehensive view and inclusive in the field of risk identification and control, on the other hand, increased the concern and risk of banks. What is certain is that the process and manner of change do not indicate a secure future.  Therefore, the present study aims to provide a comprehensive classification of types of risks in the Iranian banking industry. The statistical sample includes the number of thirty selected experts and risk experts in the banking industry who selected by sampling method based on systematic elimination. Twenty final indicators determined for risk classification in the banking industry from among 68 extractive components obtained from literature review, obtained by repeating the Delphi method three times in 1399-1400 period. The results showed that the proposed classification of banking risk includes financial risk, operational risk, economic risk, socio-political risk, compliance risk, and knowledge and technology risk. The validating results through the Delphi technique showed that Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the third round was equal to 0.899 and indicated that all indicators were significant and valid and there was a high level of consensus among experts.
Full-Text [PDF 635 kb]   (378 Downloads)    
Article Type: Qualitative Research | Subject: Arts and Humanities (General)
Received: 2021/11/28 | Accepted: 2022/01/27 | Published: 2024/09/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.