The Semantic Interpretation (Iconology) of Mourning Painting on the Body of Christ by Giotto with Emphasis on Incarnation Content

Document Type : Original Research

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student of Art Research
2 Faculty Member of Painting Faculty of Art of Alzahra University
3 Assistant Professor and Faculty School of Visual Arts Faculty of Tehran University of Art
Abstract
One of the interpretive approaches in image studies is iconology, which describes the meaning and explanation of works. In religious arts such as in Christianity, there are many symbols and signs which refer to beliefs and traditions. One of the most important beliefs of Christianity is the incarnation of God. The purpose of this study is to study the semantics of a selected painting by Giotto, an Italian painter. In order to understand the symbolic concepts related to incarnation, the question arises as how the iconological method seeks out the signs of embodiment in a Giotto painting, and what are the effects of the artist's knowledge on painting. The method applies in the course of this research is analytical-historical, with the desired approach being iconology. Library and visual sources have taken into account in the accomplishment of this paper. In the end, it is suggested that the iconology method, while studying the face, deals with visual communication and why the work is formed based on the symbols of incarnation. Finally, for the first time in the history of art, despite the dominance of religion, Giotto used painting as an independent art based on facts and expressed incarnation with realistic concepts.

Keywords

Subjects


1.Azhand, Yaghoub, Namvar Motlagh, Bahman and Erfan Manesh, Sahel (1399), "Analysis of meaning in the altar rug in the Metropolitan Museum with the method of iconology", Quarterly Journal of Art Chemistry, Year 9, (p. 37), pp. 71-85.
2.Asadi, Mahyar; Bolkhari, Hassan (2014) Feasibility study of using iconology to interpret abstract works of art, Letter of Visual and Applied Arts, (Vol. 4), pp. 37-46.
3.Etemadi, inspiration (1396), "Investigating the approach of aconology in the face of Iranian pre-home painting", the basis of visual arts, number 3, pp. 49-60.
4.Ospensky, Leonid; Losky, Vladimir (2009). Meaning of icons, translation of Majid Davoudi, Tehran: Surah Mehr.
5.Bolkhari, Hassan (2007). Manifestation in Islamic art, incarnation in Christian-Buddhist art, Soroush Thought (Sh 2). Pages 168-177.
6.Borechart, Titus (2010), Christian Art, Amir Nasri, First Printing, Tehran: waters.
7.Roiin, Pakbaz (1374) Encyclopedia of Art, Contemporary Holy Culture Publishing
8.khalili, Maryam (2009), Analysis of the Effects of Holbaus on the basis of Panovsky's theory, the role of the role, number 3, pp. 99-99.
9.Deyeri, Hossein; Ashouri, Mohammad Taghi (2016), A Study of the Archetype of Water and Archery in the Story of Rostam and Esfandiar from the Perspective of Iconology, Letter of Visual and Applied Arts, (Vol. 17), 19 pp. 36.
10.Dicran Zahrabian, Adana (2002) symbols and hybrids in Christian art, Cultural Journal of Peyman
11.Elm mehrjerdy, Nasrin; Shaker, Mohammad Kazem (1392). The doctrine of the incision on a critique scale, the magazine of religious thought, (Sh 48). Pages 65-86.
12.Abdi, Nahid (1391), Income on Aconology, Tehran: Speech.
13.Abdi, Nahid (2011), income on aconomy, theory and application of Iranian painting studies, Tehran: Speech.
14.Kakavand, Samaneh (1399), Luminous reading of the peacock inscription on the altar carpets of the twelfth century AH in the light of the message of "word Moran", Journal of Studies in Humanities, (Vol. 3), pp. 172-145.
15.Cepenberg, etch. Ji (1373), Administration and Religion, Journal of Culture, Translation Majid Mohammadi, Fourth Year, No. 4, Pages 139-147.
16.Gardner, Helen (2006), Art through Time, translated by Mohammad Taghi Faramarzi, seventh edition, Tehran: Agah Publishing Institute.
17.Ghaseler, Norman (1391), Philosophy of Religion, Translation of Dr. Hamid Reza Ayatollahi, Tehran: Wisdom Publications.
18.Mamadpour, Mohammad (2009), Ghosty and Christian Art (Age of Embeium), Second Edition, Tehran: Surah Mehr.
19.Mokhtarian, spring (1392), the importance of aconography and aconology in religion; Oconology of Younes and Fish, published in the Art Memory, under the review of the Artist House Deputy, the Institute of Publication of the city, Tehran.
20.Nasri, Amir (1392), reading the image of Erwin Panovsky's viewpoint, art chemical, number 6, pp. 7-20.
21.Nasri, Amir (2010), the approach of the audience and the reader in artistic studies, the publication of art education, the eighth period, the first issue, pp. 56-63.
22. Adams, Laurie Schneider. (2001). The Methodologies of Art: An Introduction (2nd Ed.). Boulder: Westivew Press.
23. Ann Holy (1984), Michael (1984), Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History, Cornell University Press, New York.
24. Ferreti, silvia (1989), Cassirer, Panofsky, And Warburg: Symbol, Art, and History (Richard Pierce, Tarans, Indiana University Press) Indiana.
25. Hasenmueller, Christine (1978), Panofsky, iconography, and semiotics Source, The journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, (36)3, pp. 289- 301.
26. Tillich, Paul (1957). The Dynamics of Faith, Harper Torchbooks.
27. Lavin, Irving (1990), Iconography as a humanistic Discipline (Iconography at the Crossroad), Princeton University Press, New Jersey, Princeton.
28.Panofsky, E (2009), Iconography and Iconology: An Introduction to the study of Renaissance Art, In The Art Of Art History, Preziosi, D second edition, Oxford University Press Ltd, London.
29. Panofsky, E (1955), Meaning in the Visual Arts, Double day Anchor Books, New York.
30. Panofsky, E (1972), Study in Iconology (Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance), Westview Press, Colorado.
31.URL2: http://www.visual-arts-cork.com/famous-paintings/lamentation-of-christ.htm, Sunday, 17:02 P.M
32.URL1:http://teachmiddleeast.lib.uchicago.edu/foundations/middle-east-exporter-of-religion/image-resource-bank/image-10.html Friday, 17:00 P.M
33.URL3: https://www.wga.hu/html_m/g/giotto/padova/3christ/chris20.html, Sunday, 17:30 P.M