Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

---

The occurrence of conflict of sports rules with beliefs and correct selection are among ethical issues. The way out of conflict is due to presenting a valuation criterion so that the moral subject can make the right choice. The present study has been conducted with an analytical-applied approach to examine the criteria and attitudes in conflict of two non-sumpable requirements from the perspective of psychological self-orientation and Islam. Psychological self-oriented based on the tendency of self-interest recognizes the most good and pleasure in following the rules of sports. This thought is neglected in computing by focusing on this worldly system and expressing some of the facts. Although verses from the Qur'an confirm part of this view, other verses refer to other tendencies and its superiority, so the monopoly of attitude in love with nature is incomplete and not pervasive to all realities. According to Islamic scholars, reasoning through the principles of conflict is the valuation of the opposing parties and preference is against the obligation. Compliance with God's essential requirements is unnecessary, hence the requirement of beliefs is preceded by the rules of sports. Creating a relative consensus in order to reform the rules of sports conflicting with beliefs is another strategy to resolve conflict

Keywords: Religious beliefs, conflict, love of nature, sports rules, conflict preferences

     

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

---

---